Job Market Signaling and Job Search
نویسنده
چکیده
The high cost of searching for employers borne by prospective employees increases friction in the labor market and inhibits formation of e¢ cient employer-employee relationships. It is conventionally agreed that mechanisms that reduce the search costs (e.g., internet portals for job search) lower unemployment and improve overall welfare. We demonstrate that a reduction of the search costs may have the converse e¤ect. We show that in a signaling job market with random matching lower search costs lead to fewer employees willing to exert e¤ort and, in a separating equilibrium, to more individuals opting to stay completely out of the job market and remain unemployed. Furthermore, we show that lower search costs not only deteriorate the market composition, but also impair e¢ ciency by leading to more expensive signaling in a separating equilibrium. Keywords: signaling; job market; job search; separating equilibrium; unemployment; moral hazard JEL classi cation: D82; C72; C73; J64 This paper was conceived during the activities of the Game Theory and Evolution group in 2006-2007, organized by Sergiu Hart and Avi Shmida and hosted by the Institute for Advanced Studies and the Center for Rationality, the Hebrew University. We are thankful to the group members, in particular to its organizers and the host institutions. We also thank Tymo y Mylovanov and Eyal Winter for valuable comments. y University of Bonn and KSE-KEI. Email: [email protected] z Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Green by Comparison: Deviant and Normative Transmutations of Job Search Envy in a Temporal Context
We propose a novel temporal-based theory of how a painful social comparative emotion—job search envy—transmutes as deviant or normative job search behaviors (resume fraud or search effort). We theorize that as job searches progress across time or discrete events, temporal-based pressure increases via perceptions that situations are less changeable or more critical, propelling envious job seeker...
متن کاملGreen by Comparison 1 GREEN BY COMPARISON: DEVIANT AND NORMATIVE TRANSMUTATIONS OF JOB SEARCH ENVY IN A TEMPORAL CONTEXT
We propose a novel temporal-based theory of how a painful social comparative emotion – job search envy – transmutes as deviant or normative job search behaviors (resume fraud or search effort). We theorize that as job searches progress across time or discrete events, temporal-based pressure increases via perceptions that situations are less changeable or more critical, propelling envious job se...
متن کاملتحلیل نقش مراکز کاریابی در بازار کار با نگاهی به تجربه ایران
Job centers have an outstanding role in the process of labor force employment through cutting the costs of labor force adjustment. This paper studies the dynamic models of the labor force demand with the aim of pinpointing job centers role in labor market. According to the results, "job search and matching" approach better and more thoroughly considers the role of job centers in the labor marke...
متن کاملShort Term Gain, Long Term Pain Informal Job Search Methods and Post-Displacement Outcomes
This paper examines the role of informal job search methods on the labour market outcomes of displaced workers. Informal job search methods could alleviate short-term labour market difficulties of displaced workers by providing information on job opportunities, allowing them to signal their productivity and may mitigate wage losses through better post-displacement job matching. However if displ...
متن کاملStructural Empirical Evaluation of Job Search Monitoring
In this paper we develop a rich model that describes the labor market behavior of both unemployed and employed workers. Our job search models explicitly models endogenous job search effort and accounts for monitoring of job search behavior of unemployed workers. To estimate the model we use data from a randomized experiment conducted in the Netherlands to evaluate the effectiveness of job searc...
متن کامل